|  Healthcare Training Institute - Quality Education since 1979CE for Psychologist, Social Worker, Counselor, & MFT!! 
 Section 10 
Treatment-Resistant Depression
  |  
| 
 Read content below or listen to audio.
 Left click audio track to Listen;  Right click  to "Save..." mp3
 
 In the last section, we discussed three goals that depressed  and dysthymic clients are trying to achieve through their pathological  self-criticism.  These three goals of  self-critical depressed clients included:  self-improvement; avoiding  egotism; and reducing expectations. In this section, we will examine four different types of  resistance to treatment of self-destructive criticism in depressed and  dysthymic clients.  These four different  types of resistance to treatment include:   belief in the truth of the  criticisms; settling for mediocrity;  morally wrong; and disbelief in efficacy. We will discuss further techniques for resistant clients in  the next section. 4 Types of Resistance to Treatment 
 ♦ Resistance # 1. Belief in the  Truth of the Criticisms
 Clients frequently  lock themselves into destructive,  self-critical scenarios by mistakenly regarding the whole matter as a truth issue.  They see themselves, not as  active critics, but as victims, compelled by the  evidence to recognize factually grounded truths about themselves.  They do not choose how they see or treat  themselves; they are forced by the  facts to draw certain conclusions.
 Ned, age 39, had convinced himself that he was beyond help.  He stated, "You don’t seem to understand; the  bedrock truth about me is that deep  down I am a complete and utter asshole."  I stated to Ned, "It’s not a truth issue; it’s an issue of how you treat yourself."  
 This statement, which I make to many of my  resistant clients, draws their attention to the simple but crucial distinction between the facts and  one’s response to those facts.  Even in those cases where there are  undeniably negative truths about themselves  for persons to contend with, these do not necessitate any particular treatment of themselves.
 
 Think of your Ned.  Is he or she clinging to the belief of truth  in his or her criticisms?
 ♦  Resistance # 2. Settling for  MediocrityMany clients are unwilling to give up perfectionistic standards because, in their minds, doing so is tantamount to settling for mediocrity and abandoning the struggle for personal excellence.
 
 To  these types of clients, it is better to strive for perfection and suffer some painful consequences than to lower their  personal standards.  I believe that going  against these values is a losing game.  Rather, I prefer to allow my  clients to keep these standards, but  to use them in a new way that will better achieve their existing purposes.  The problem lies not in the standard itself, but in their treating  it as a criterion of personal  adequacy.
 Berta, age 51, regularly criticized herself for the perceived poor state of her home.  Berta stated, "If I can’t even provide my  family with a clean home, what good am I as a wife and mother?  If I do as you’re telling me to do, I may not  be able to provide my family with  the best!  Then what am I going to do?"  
 I stated, "It’s  not a matter of settling for imperfection.  Instead, I want you to think of your desire  for perfection as more of a guiding star that will rarely if ever  be attained, but that may nonetheless point a direction for your striving.   Remember, nobody’s tombstone  ever said that ‘She never had any dust behind her couch.’"
 
 Think of your Berta.  How would you convince him or her that he or  she was not settling for mediocrity?
 ♦  Resistance # 3. Morally WrongMany clients persist in their  self-destructive ways because they believe it is virtuous to do so and immorally egotistical to appraise themselves in more positive ways.
 
 In the cases  of morally driven clients, I have found the following questions beneficial to  discuss with clients:
 
  
    Is it       any more virtuous to abuse and damage oneself psychologically than it is to do so physically with alcohol, tobacco, or other substances?Since       destructive self-criticism is so damaging to our ability to function, do we have a moral obligation to others such as our children and families not to destroy our ability to care for and relate to them?Do not       destructive self-critical practices fail a very critical moral test insofar as they diminish our ability to change our unacceptable behavior?Is it       morally acceptable to treat any human being the way you are       treating yourself? Would you have used these questions with any or your morally  driven clients? ♦ Resistance # 4. Disbelief in  EfficacySome clients fear that many  of these approaches will prove too weak for correcting their own mistakes.  If  they are to change such weaknesses,  they believe they must bring serious negative consequences to bear on themselves.   Many times, the client’s current approach is the same one they wish to continue, no matter how ineffective the  current approach is.
 Vince, age 42, believed in tackling what he perceived as his  "problem" with a hardline approach.  He stated, "I want to come at  this thing like I come at everything:  full throttle.  I just need a little boost, that’s all."  I stated  to Vince, "Currently, your method is not working.  Have you ever been able to shout your own  inner critic down or does he always seem to out-shout you?"  He stated, "I have  tried, numerous times.  But I don’t think  I ever try hard enough.  I was hoping that you would be able to give  me a way of pushing even further,  but that’s not what this is about, is it?"   
 Think of your Vince.  Is he or she  stuck in his or her old methods?
 In this section, we discussed four different types of  resistance to treatment of self-destructive criticism in depressed and  dysthymic clients.  These four different  types of resistance to treatment included:  belief in the truth of the  criticisms; settling for mediocrity; morally wrong; and disbelief in efficacy. In the next section, we will examine three steps for  minimizing resistance to the therapeutic directive.  These three steps for minimizing resistance  to the therapeutic directive include:  appeal to what matters; the "positive"  connotation; and speaking to the  client’s positive.Reviewed 2023
 Peer-Reviewed Journal Article References: Abel, A., Hayes, A. M., Henley, W., & Kuyken, W. (2016). Sudden gains in cognitive–behavior therapy for treatment-resistant depression: Processes of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84(8), 726–737.
 
 Andrews, L. A., Hayes, A. M., Abel, A., & Kuyken, W. (2020). Sudden gains and patterns of symptom change in cognitive–behavioral therapy for treatment-resistant depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 88(2), 106–118.
 
 Hewitt, P. L., Smith, M. M., Deng, X., Chen, C., Ko, A., Flett, G. L., & Paterson, R. J. (2020). The perniciousness of perfectionism in group therapy for depression: A test of the perfectionism social disconnection model. Psychotherapy, 57(2), 206–218.
 
 Rost, F., Luyten, P., Fearon, P., & Fonagy, P. (2019). Personality and outcome in individuals with treatment-resistant depression—Exploring differential treatment effects in the Tavistock Adult Depression Study (TADS). Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 87(5), 433–445.
 
 QUESTION 10
 What are four different types of resistance to  treatment of self-destructive criticism in depressed and dysthymic clients? 
To select and enter your answer go to .
 
 
 
 
 
 
 |