Add To Cart

Section 1
An Attorney's Perspective: Preparing the Expert to Testify

Question 1 | Test | Table of Contents

California Courts 

If you wish to increase the text size of this publication, maximize your window.
Click outside the box below, press Ctrl “+” several times, then scroll.
Questions? Email: [email protected]

-Kuchler, Deborah D. An In-Depth Look at Direct Examination of Expert Witnesses. California Courts, 2010 p 5-7.

Peer-Reviewed Journal Article References:
Gardner, B. O., Titcomb, C., Cramer, R. J., Stroud, C. H., & Bate, B. P. (2013). Perceived personality similarity and perceptions of expert testimony. Journal of Individual Differences, 34(4), 185–192.

Henderson, K. S., & Levett, L. M. (2016). Can expert testimony sensitize jurors to variations in confession evidence? Law and Human Behavior, 40(6), 638–649.

Maeder, E. M., & Pica, E. (2014). Secondary confessions: The influence (or lack thereof) of incentive size and scientific expert testimony on jurors’ perceptions of informant testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 38(6), 560–568.

How to ensure favorable expert testimony? To select and enter your answer go to Test

Section 2
Table of Contents