Add To Cart

Section 2
An Attorney's Perspective: Direct Examination of the Expert

Question 2 | Test | Table of Contents

California Courts 

If you wish to increase the text size of this publication, maximize your window.
Click outside the box below, press Ctrl “+” several times, then scroll.
Questions? Email: [email protected]

-Kuchler, Deborah D. An In-Depth Look at Direct Examination of Expert Witnesses. California Courts, 2010 p 8-20.

Peer-Reviewed Journal Article References:
Edwards, E. R., Sissoko, D. R. G., Abrams, D., Samost, D., La Gamma, S., & Geraci, J. (2020). Connecting mental health court participants with services: Process, challenges, and recommendations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 26(4), 463–475.

Gardner, B. O., Titcomb, C., Cramer, R. J., Stroud, C. H., & Bate, B. P. (2013). Perceived personality similarity and perceptions of expert testimony. Journal of Individual Differences, 34(4), 185–192.

Grabman, J. H., Cash, D. K., Slane, C. R., & Dodson, C. S. (2021). Improving the interpretation of verbal eyewitness confidence statements by distinguishing perceptions of certainty from those of accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied.

Greenspan, R. L., & Loftus, E. F. (2020). Eyewitness confidence malleability: Misinformation as post-identification feedback. Law and Human Behavior, 44(3), 194–208.

What are the four Stages of Direct Examination of Experts? To select and enter your answer go to Test

Section 3
Table of Contents