If you wish to increase the text size of this publication, maximize your window.
Click outside the box below, press Ctrl “+” several times, then scroll.
Questions? Email: [email protected]
-Villanova University School of Law, PA, USA. What judges and lawyers think about the testimony of mental health experts: a survey of the courts and bar. The National Center for Biotechnology Information, P 1.
Peer-Reviewed Journal Article References:
Baillie, P. (2015). Review of Clinicians in court: A guide to subpoenas, depositions, testifying, and everything else you need to know (2nd ed.) [Review of the book Clinicians in court: A guide to subpoenas, depositions, testifying, and everything else you need to know (2nd ed.), by A. E. Barsky]. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 56(2), 267–268.
Edwards, E. R., Sissoko, D. R. G., Abrams, D., Samost, D., La Gamma, S., & Geraci, J. (2020). Connecting mental health court participants with services: Process, challenges, and recommendations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 26(4), 463–475.
Grabman, J. H., Cash, D. K., Slane, C. R., & Dodson, C. S. (2021). Improving the interpretation of verbal eyewitness confidence statements by distinguishing perceptions of certainty from those of accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied.
Henderson, K. S., & Levett, L. M. (2016). Can expert testimony sensitize jurors to variations in confession evidence?Law and Human Behavior, 40(6), 638–649.
Zapf, P. A., Kukucka, J., Kassin, S. M., & Dror, I. E. (2018). Cognitive bias in forensic mental health assessment: Evaluator beliefs about its nature and scope. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 24(1), 1–10.
What is often important evidence considered by criminal courts in determining issues arising throughout the adjudicative process, but not all evidence provided is equally valid or probative? To select and enter your answer go to Test.