Healthcare Training Institute - Quality Education since 1979CE for Psychologist, Social Worker, Counselor, & MFT!! 
  
  
  
Section 3   
Informed Consent 
 |  
|  
 
Read content below or listen to audio.  
Left click audio track to Listen;  Right click  to "Save..." mp3  
 
In the last section, we reviewed the ways in which HIPAA  guidelines affect note-taking during client sessions.  Ethical boundaries created by HIPAA regarding  note-taking included the following three areas:   categorization of notes; instances of exemption; and exclusions. 
In this section, we will examine three ethical boundaries  created by HIPAA related to the client’s informed consent.  These three concepts related to the client’s  informed consent include:  HIPAA  requirements; readability; and comprehension. 
3 Ethical Boundaries Related to Informed Consent  
♦ #1 HIPAA Requirements  
  The first ethical boundary related to informed consent is HIPAA  requirements.  Although this may feel  like a review from section 1, I felt we needed to go over the basics before  dealing with such issues as readability.    
   
  As you have already encountered many times before, clients must be  presented with a Notice of Privacy Practices or NPPs in which he or she is  informed of the HIPAA policies regarding client’s rights and the disclosure of  information such as medical records.  The  client must then sign, initial, or otherwise acknowledge that they have  received the notice.  
    
  In this way, the  client’s rights are protected and the practitioner is also not at risk for  becoming liable if a client does not agree with the policies later on in the  treatment.  According to HIPAA, these  NPPs  or Notices of Privacy Practice must  be written in "plain English" in order to facilitate the client’s  comprehension.  The legislation maintains  that "the more understandable the NPP is, the more confidence the public will  have in the covered entity's commitment to protecting the privacy of health  information."   
   
  Therefore, it is highly  recommended that NPPs are written in such a way that most, if not all, clients  will have a sufficient grasp of the concepts laid out with little or no  interpretation.  This can be difficult  when many mental health professionals, such as myself, receive their NPP’s from private  companies or professional associations and adapt them to individualize the form  with relevant information about the particular practice.   
   
  Where do you get your NPP?  Do you formulate your own?   
♦ #2 Readability 
  The second ethical boundary related to informed consent is  the readability of the NPP forms.  As  stated earlier, HIPAA requires that the NPP forms be written in "plain English"  in order to optimize the comprehension of a maximum amount of clients.  
    
  Therefore, the level of readability of the  majority of NPPs should correspond to the average reading level of the  population, right?   
   
  Keeping this in mind,  it may not surprise you to know that about fifty percent of the adult  population reads at or below a ninth grade reading level.  Therefore, for the NPP’s to be comprehended  by at least fifty percent of the population, the readability level should  correspond to close to a ninth grade reading level.  However, according to a study conducted by  Steven Walfish and Bryan Ducey, ninety-six percent of States circulate NPPs above  a ninth grade reading level.   
What does this signify for the client?  It signifies that many, if not most, clients do  not initially understand the NPP and most probably do not bother to ask their mental  health professional due to embarrassment or apathy.  If this is true, many clients are not being  adequately informed of their rights which also leaves the mental health  professional open to liability should a lawsuit ensue.   
Maggie, age 14, was being sexually abused by her father,  Joe.  She felt she was needing to talk to  someone. Maggie told her case worker, Helen about the abuse, but asked her to  keep it, as she put, "secret."   Helen, according to the law, then filed a court order against the father who was arrested.  Terrified to testify  in court in front of her hostile parents, Maggie retracted her statement and  felt that Helen had betrayed her.   
   
  During  their sessions, she would cuss, scream, and threaten Helen whenever sexual  abuse was brought up.  Helen then tried  to inform Maggie that what Helen had done was in accordance with  law and the informed consent form, signed by  her, indicated that Helen was allowed to disclose to the courts about sexual  abuse.  Maggie screamed, "I didn’t  understand a god damn word of that bullshit paper!  You told me to sign, so I signed!"  Because Maggie had not understood the  implications of sharing such delicate information to her case worker, the  client-clinician relationship deteriorated.    
   
  Can you think of a client who may have not understood the NPP you  provided them?  Do you need to reevaluate  the wording of your own NPP? 
♦ #3 Confirming Comprehension 
  In addition to HIPAA guidelines and readability, the third ethical  boundary related to informed consent is confirming comprehension.  Because HIPAA requires that NPPs be written  in "plain English" and clearly this is not being accomplished by cookie-cut  forms, I have found that discussing rights with the client can help me know  that they understand their rights.   
   
  For  clients with a very low reading level, I read it through with them and  summarize the key points so that they can hear from me a more comprehensive  interpretation.  Sometimes, I make  revisions to NPP forms that are much too difficult for most of my clients.  This makes it easier to distribute and  becomes less taxing on my time.  Listen  to the following excerpt from an NPP. 
   
"In performing such functions, we  may rely on certain business associates to assist us.  We will share with our business associates  only the minimum amount of personal health information necessary for this  purpose." 
 
This particular sentence was long and contained several  clauses that may confuse the less educated client.  It received a grade level of 12.0.  The sentences were then revised to fit a  grade level of 6.6.  Listen closely and  see if you can hear a difference: 
 
In doing so we may rely on certain  business associates to help us.  We will  share your health information with them.   But we will only share the minimum amount that is needed." 
The second set of sentences used many smaller sentences and  fewer clauses.  Also, it replaced more  difficult words with less difficult ones.   Think of your NPP forms.  Could  they be rewritten to optimize client comprehension? 
In this section, we discussed three concepts related to the  client’s informed consent.  These three  concepts related to the client’s informed consent included:  HIPAA requirements; readability; and comprehension. 
In the next section, we will examine three concepts that focus  on the HIPAA guidelines related to minors.   These three concepts related to HIPAA guidelines on minors include:  autonomy; State Laws vs. HIPAA; and exemptions. 
  Reviewed 2023 
Peer-Reviewed Journal Article References:  
  Harris, S. E., & Robinson Kurpius, S. E. (2014). Social networking and professional ethics: Client searches, informed consent, and disclosure. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 45(1), 11–19. 
   
  Hudgins, C., Rose, S., Fifield, P. Y., & Arnault, S. (2013). Navigating the legal and ethical foundations of informed consent and confidentiality in integrated primary care. Families, Systems, & Health, 31(1), 9–19. 
McClellan, M. J., Florell, D., Palmer, J., & Kidder, C. (2020). Clinician telehealth attitudes in a rural community mental health center setting. Journal of Rural Mental Health, 44(1), 62–73. 
Pierce, B. S., Perrin, P. B., & McDonald, S. D. (2020). Pre-COVID-19 deterrents to practicing with videoconferencing telepsychology among psychologists who didn't. Psychological Services. Advance online publication. 
   
  Pomerantz, A. M., & Handelsman, M. M. (2004). Informed consent revisited: An updated written question format. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35(2), 201–205. 
Raja, S., Rabinowitz, E. P., & Gray, M. J. (2021). Universal screening and trauma informed care: Current concerns and future directions. Families, Systems, & Health. Advance online publication. 
   
  QUESTION 3   
  What are three concepts related to the client’s  informed consent? To select and enter your answer go to . 
  
  
    
   
   
 
 |