|  Healthcare Training Institute - Quality Education since 1979CE for Psychologist, Social Worker, Counselor, & MFT!!
 Section 1
Therapeutic Boundaries
  |  |  | 
 Read content below or listen to audio.
 Left click audio track to Listen;  Right click  to "Save..." mp3
 Four Basic Premises What exactly are boundaries? As you know, boundaries 
set limits between you and your client. Your professional Code of Ethics helps 
to set these boundaries or limits. This course will explore the blur, or gray areas, in these not so clear-cut boundaries. The goal, by the end of this course, is to increase 
your self-awareness and perhaps gain a new perspective on setting some client 
limits in your therapeutic relationships.
 This 
is a two course series. The first course in this series will cover: basic premises; attitudes 
and behaviors; gender culture; use of defense mechanisms; security vs. growth; 
    middle-class values; setting session tempo; nonverbal communication; touch; and 
acceptance that leads to expectations.   
The second course will discuss the boundaries issues of: self-determination, transference 
and counter transference, friendship versus partnership; judgments; setting the 
session focus; partialization; advice giving; making promises; confrontation; 
manipulation; and referrals.
 Four Boundary Questions
 The following are four values that constitute a basic premise of the therapeutic 
relationship. Let's look at how even the most basic of concepts present boundary 
questions. Here is an example of each of the four values:
 
 ♦ #1. The 
worth of the individual. A basic premise right? Think again. Who determines how 
worthy someone is to retain custody of his or her children? When you write your 
recommendations to the court, what was the boundary or limit you set in your report 
regarding the intensity and frequency of abuse for the "rehabilitated" 
parents seeking to regain custody?
 ♦       #2. 
    The right of self-determination is also a basic ethical premise that raises 
boundary issues. Later in this course we will explore the issue of suicide. However, 
with a suicidal client you treated, where did you set the boundary between freedom 
and commitment to an in-patient unit?  ♦ #3. 
    A third philosophical basis of the therapeutic relationship is the right to share 
the benefits of society, but at what point does your client with a substance-related 
disorder lose his rights to share the benefits of society? Let's explore this 
one further. Some substance-use treatment professionals have criticized the classification 
of substance-use disorders by the DSM, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, as simplistic 
and too straightforward.  They have argued that substance use cannot be forced 
  into the two arbitrary categories of abuse or dependence, but rather that substance 
  use represents a continuum that ranges from non-use to dependency. With your last 
  "substance-related disordered client," what criteria did you use to 
  set a boundary in the gray area of the DSM classification system, which many view 
  as inadequate, regarding court orders to a treatment facility and depriving the 
  client of his or her right to benefit from societal freedom? ♦ #4. The mutual rights and responsibility between your client and society is a philosophical 
basis of the mental health professions. Now, regarding the boundary between rights 
of your client, versus the rights of society...ask yourself...the last time your 
client threatened to harm an identifiable other, where and how in your mind did 
you draw the limit regarding a need to warn or not warn the other party? 
 The point to be made here is that, even in the most basic of premises regarding 
our mental health profession you are drawing ethical boundaries.
 ♦ Four Basic Premises Examples From 
the preceding examples, select one which is most meaningful. Here are the four 
basic premises examples again:
 1. Your recommendations to the court 
for treatment decisions about custody in a child abuse case;
 2. Suicide and commitment;
 3. Substance abuse; and
 4. Duty-to-warn regarding 
threats to an identifiable other. Ask yourself
how do I set boundaries with 
this difficult issue?
 
 ♦ Strategy for Setting  Boundaries Effectively with Clients
 It has been my experience that I set boundaries 
effectively with clients when I feel I am able to gain personal objectivity. How 
do I gain this objectivity? By increasing my personal awareness regarding my needs, 
weaknesses, and strengths.
 By 
"awareness" I mean my ability to deal with my personality patterns and 
client issues, as they may relate to my life experience, which may cloud my ability 
to relate to the client.
 I look at my level of openness. I look at my 
ability to be aware of values, attitudes, and patterns of behaving in the groups 
of which I consider myself to be a part. Lastly, I look at my ability to differ and stand 
alone when necessary
should I need to act as an advocate for the client. 
It is one thing to recognize my shortcomings and another to change them.
 
 - Stone, M. (1999). Boundary Violations between Therapist and Patient. Psychiatric Annals, 670(7).
 Reviewed 2023
 
 Peer-Reviewed Journal Article References:
 Brend, D. M., Krane, J., & Saunders, S. (2020). Exposure to trauma in intimate partner violence human service work: A scoping review. Traumatology, 26(1), 127–136.
 
 Carsky, M. (2020). How treatment arrangements enhance transference analysis in transference-focused psychotherapy. Psychoanalytic Psychology.
 
 Drum, K. B., & Littleton, H. L. (2014). Therapeutic boundaries in telepsychology: Unique issues and best practice recommendations. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 45(5), 309–315.
 
 Geller, S. M., & Porges, S. W. (2014). Therapeutic presence: Neurophysiological mechanisms mediating feeling safe in therapeutic relationships. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 24(3), 178–192.
 
 Summers, F. (2017). Sexual relationships between patient and therapist: Boundary violation or collapse of the therapeutic space? Psychoanalytic Psychology, 34(2), 175–181.
 
 Wu, K. S., & Sonne, J. L. (2021). Therapist boundary crossings in the digital age: Psychologists’ practice frequencies and perceptions of ethicality. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice.
 QUESTION 
  1What are four values that constitute the philosophical bases of the 
  therapeutic relationship that present boundary challenges? To select and enter 
  your answer go to .
 
 
 
 
 
 
 |